Mar 13, 2008 (
NATO allies unsure yet on missile shield plan; NATO secretary general says alliance 10 percent short of its military needs in Afghanistan; UN Must Boost Coordination to Defeat Taliban Rebels, Envoy Says.
NATO allies unsure yet on missile shield plan
BRUSSELS - NATO will delay a decision on whether to commission a missile shield to protect those parts of Europe not covered by a planned U.S. system because major issues remain open, an alliance official said on Wednesday, as reported by REUTERS on Mar 13.
NATO allies
The
"I don't think we are going to see a decision there. I don't see any nation pushing for a decision on an actual procurement program," NATO Assistant Secretary-General for Defence Investment Division Peter Flory told a news briefing.
"The questions tend to be: How much would this cost? How effective would it be? Where would it fit in with a broader concept of how you would deal with weapons of mass destruction?"
While insisting that
Flory said NATO allies agreed on many aspects of the plan, notably the nature of the threat, the feasibility of missile defence, and the principle of "indivisibility of security" under which the security of all allies counted equally.
Consensus within NATO has been made all the harder because the United States has not been able to clinch deals with Warsaw and Prague on putting parts of its shield on their soil. Polish officials say agreement could be months off.
Some NATO members in northern Europe do not see why they should pay for a system that would be focused on protecting the southern part of the alliance, while
Flory said he expected NATO allies in
But Flory said there was no agreement within NATO so far on how much a "bolt-on" system -- which would likely involve radars and interceptors on a smaller scale than the
Some industry estimates put the cost at as low as one billion euros split between the NATO members over 20 years, but a number of allies say the actual cost would be much greater.
NATO secretary general says alliance 10 percent short of its military needs in
"We are, as you know, around 90 percent of what we need," Jaap de Hoop Scheffer told reporters in Warsaw, where he is on a one-day visit a month before the NATO summit in Romania.
"I am now seeing to it that the rest of the 10 percent will also be filled, and that is the responsibility of the alliance and the alliance nations as a whole."
The year 2007 was the deadliest in
"There's always a need for more forces," de Hoop Scheffer said.
He declined say which countries need to do more, saying: "I'm not going to mention any names."
All 26 NATO members have troops serving in the Afghan mission. Those on the southern front lines — mainly
Efforts to get countries to send more troops to
UN Must Boost Coordination to Defeat Taliban Rebels, Envoy Says
The United Nations must coordinate efforts to improve security in Afghanistan, where the Taliban insurgency is ``more ruthless'' than the international community ever imagined, the head of UN peacekeeping said -- as Bloomberg reported on Mar 13.
Government institutions are fragile, the opium trade is flourishing and countries must unite on how to tackle the crisis, Jean-Marie Guehenno told the Security Council yesterday as it debated the UN's mandate in
``The UN bears its own share of responsibility for deficiencies in international coordination,'' Guehenno said, adding the world body needs the support of ``all international and Afghan partners.''
The
Suicide attacks in
The top
New Mandate
The Security Council, which must approve Eide's appointment, yesterday debated his role and is scheduled to vote on a new mandate for the UN's political mission in
In his latest report on
He is scheduled to attend an international meeting on
The bulk of the fighting is done by British, American, Dutch and Canadian troops in Taliban strongholds in the southern provinces. The
No comments:
Post a Comment